Olympus Scopes Lawsuits
Explore a Claim for Harm Caused by a Duodenoscope, Endoscope, or other Scope Procedure
Let Miller Law Group Help!
If you have a legal matter you would like to discuss with a Miller Law Group personal injury attorney, please complete and submit the form below. We will get back to you shortly.
Lawsuits allege that the design of certain reusable Olympus scopes allows bacteria to remain on devices and cause infections, illnesses, or medical conditions. You may have grounds to investigate an Olympus scope claim if you underwent a procedure involving a reusable scope, developed a serious infection or related condition afterward, and required significant medical treatment. A claim may also warrant review if you or a loved one received notice of exposure to dangerous pathogens due to an Olympus scope. A legal review can help identify whether compensation may be available following an infection from a reusable endoscope, duodenoscope, bronchoscope, or similar device. Miller Law Group evaluates Olympus claims to help individuals and their loved ones hold the medical device manufacturer accountable for harm caused by faulty scopes.
Signs You May Have an
Olympus Scope Infection Claim
No individual factor establishes a lawsuit. A legal review may be warranted if:
- An Olympus scope was used during a qualifying procedure in or after 2015, and
- You developed a serious infection or condition within about 30 to 90 days, and
- The infection required significant medical treatment; or
- You received an exposure notice about a procedure for yourself or a loved one and needed diagnostics, medical intervention, or medical monitoring.
Factors That an Olympus Scope Infection Lawyer Considers
A lawyer can help evaluate the circumstances of your Olympus scope infection and whether a product liability claim may be warranted based on the key factors below.
| Qualifying Procedure | Olympus Scopes | Infection, Illness, or Complication | Significant Medical Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
Examples:
|
Including:
|
Examples:
|
Examples:
|
What Is the Olympus Scope Lawsuit About?
The lawsuits against Olympus generally allege that the manufacturer’s scope designs did not allow for complete cleaning and that marketing these as reusable exposed patients to pathogens that caused serious infections. Legal action for scope-related infections typically falls under these claims:
Defective Design
Scopes featured complex channels, seals, moving components, crevices, or other internal areas that could be inaccessible or difficult to fully clean or sanitize.
Failure to Warn
Plaintiffs allege that Olympus did not adequately warn healthcare providers or patients about infection risks associated with reusable scope devices.
Inadequate Instructions
The product instructions did not adequately explain how to safely clean, disinfect, or sterilize the scopes, nor did they sufficiently communicate the risks of reusing these devices.
Delayed Reporting
Allegations claim that Olympus delayed adverse-event reporting and regulatory compliance for devices it knew could present hazards.
How Can an Olympus Scope Cause an Infection?
The claims assert that reusing a medical instrument that isn’t designed for adequate sterilization can allow the transfer of hazardous biological material from one patient to the next. The contaminants have been linked to drug-resistant superbugs that can cause serious and life-threatening conditions.
The process of contracting an infection typically followed these steps:
Step 1
A reusable scope is used during a procedure.
The device enters the body, and material becomes trapped in the scope’s moving parts or inaccessible areas.
Step 2
The device is reprocessed.
This may include cleaning, brushing, disinfection, drying, and storage.
Step 3
Bacteria remain on the device.
Bacteria grow and multiply inside the scope, and a resistant biofilm can develop.
Step 4
The next patient is exposed to medical hazards.
A contaminated scope is reused, exposing the patient to bacteria and causing an infection or illness.
What Compensation May Be Available in an Olympus Scope Lawsuit?
Compensation may address financial, emotional, and physical impacts, depending on the individual case facts, severity of harm, and available evidence. Examples of compensation that may be available include:
- Hospital and emergency medical bills
- ICU care
- Antibiotic treatment
- Surgeries or follow-up procedures
- Long-term medical complications
- Lost wages
- Reduced earning ability
- Pain and suffering
- Disability
- Wrongful death and funeral expenses, when applicable
Frequently Asked Questions About Olympus Scope Infection Lawsuits
Contact the surgical facility or hospital to inquire about the procedure or contact an Olympus scope infection lawyer who can help you request medical records, device tracking logs, or operative reports to confirm whether a scope was used.
Yes. If you underwent an ERCP, bronchoscopy, or other procedure and do not know the exact model used, an attorney can help you identify it and review your case for a possible connection between exposure and an applicable infection or illness.
If an individual died due to an illness or complications caused by a contaminated Olympus scope, a family member can generally pursue a lawsuit for wrongful death, depending on state laws. In North Carolina, a representative or executor of the deceased person’s estate must file the claim on behalf of surviving family members. An attorney can help you understand your legal standing.
North Carolina statutes generally impose a three-year limit from the date of injury or discovery of the infection, but deadlines may shift based on procedure information, equipment used, and outcomes. An attorney can evaluate your specific case timeline to help inform your next steps.
No. A lawsuit for a defective medical device generally holds the manufacturer—in this case, Olympus— accountable. If the investigation reveals wrongdoing by the facility, such as using a device after recall, the hospital or surgical center may share liability through a medical malpractice claim.
Lawyers who work under a contingency agreement won’t charge you any upfront fees to pursue an Olympus scope infection lawsuit. Paying lawyer fees on a contingency basis means they collect a percentage of the total recovery, but only if the claim is successful.
Speak With a Lawyer About an Olympus Scope Infection Claim
If you or a loved one developed a serious infection after a procedure involving a reusable Olympus scope, the attorneys at Miller Law Group are here to help. We can investigate the procedure and scope used to determine whether the timing and records support a potential claim, and what legal options may be available to you. Our consultations are free and confidential.
Hear from a North Carolina personal injury law firm about their team’s commitment to their clients.
